WHO said WHAT

WHERE IS Birthday Gift ???

AT PRESS MEET VIGYAN BHAVAN

WESTERN COURT GALLEY

LIST OF POSTS IN THIS BLOG AT A GLANCE

2010 (93)
o April (19)
+ HOW NIZAM GAVE BELLARY RAYALASEEMA TO ENGLISH
+ NIZAM CAPITAL FROM AURANGABAD TO HYDERABAD in1763
+ Nizam,BRITISH,story of Circar Districts
+ Facts about Hyderabad,Asafjahis
+ WHO IS ASAFJAHI First king Mir Kamaruddin
+ IRRIGATION FACTS
+ WATER SHARE subject from an Friend
+ WATER and Harrasment
+ satavahanas first telangana bhuddist rulers from k...
+ MINING SECTOR,MUSHAM
+ GSDP from agriculture sector
+ TELANGANA DEVELOPMENT - myth dist wide data
+ G O 610 good bad ugly
+ GENTLEMEN’ S AGREEMENT 1956
+ MULKI RULE CHAP III,APPENDIX "N"
+ THE MULKI RULES 1949
+ Danger behind the mulki rule
+ Telangana was part of the princely state of...
+ Met Shri Krishna Committee,SEE @,FAX,Phone no,
o March (32)
+ TCMG meets Jaipal Reddy
+ Centre's decision to form Telangana
+ RAHUL GANDHI WHO BEARS THE BURDEN OF NEEDY
+ VISITED RAJGHAT,saw gandhi words on DICENTRALIZATI...
+ TCMG Gave Rahul Gandhi Satavahana coin,
+ Telanagana TCMG stay in Delhi at Historic Western ...
+ SARKAR SEEMA under Presidency RULE
+ We want Telangana THE PEOPLE CHOICE
+ Story of MULKI rules
+ Men came to Hyderabad to rule Telangana FROM MADRA...
+ Telangana - A Historical Perspective
+ COMPARE FIRST & THIS 5 YEAR PLANS
+ FAILED MARRIAGE
+ Telangana and Andhra regions presented two diverge...
+ NATIONS SMALLER THAN A DISTRICT IN TELANGANA
+ Dumping English style employees
+ about TCMG
+ TCMG report extracts for info from open document,
+ RAHUL GANDHI meets TCMG members
+ TCMG goes to New delhi on Telangana
+ ART OF SATAVAHANAS
+ MY RESEARCH PAPER DEDICATED TELANGANA PEOPLE
+ LIST OF KINGS IN SCHOLAR VIEW
+ KINGS LIST OF SATAVAHANA
+ SATAVAHANA FOUGHT ANGAINST FOREIGN INVADERS
+ PURANAS GIVE OUR HISTORY
+ words talari,talavara, nagamma,viramma.
+ SATAVAHANA COINS
+ MAHATALAVARASA TELUGU WORDS OF PRE STAVAHANA KINGS...
+ HISTORY OF SATAVAHANA FEMALE ATTENDEANTS
+ other version of KOHINOOR
o February (42)
+ GENTLEMEN AGREMENT FATE IN 2010
+ GENTLEMAN AGREEMENT
+ FAZAL ALI TELANGANA SHOULD BE SEPERATE
+ ANDHRA STATE IN 1956
+ TELANGANA IN 1956
+ TELANGANA FOREVER
+ WE WANT TELANGANA
+ spirit of telangana,Telanagana UTSAV
+ FORMATION OF TELANGANA
+ HISTORY OF TELANGANA
+ PEOM on telangana
+ WHY TWO STATES Burgula version
+ Telangana Blood Donation into GUINNES RECORD
+ ITALY LAW NEWS:shoe maoists in OU stating SUPREME ...
+ Sri Krishna Commision P n in English
+ Sri Krishna commision Worksheet @ in TELUGU
+ SRI KRISHNA COMMISION Home Ministry letter
+ TELANGANA FRIENDS SPREAD ABOUT UR BLOG
+ NAGARJUNASAGAR DAM PLANNED FROM1903
+ TILTED DAM,SWALLOWED NIZAM TIGER RESORT
+ TELANGANA WATER SATELLITE MAP
+ 3K;tmcft TELANGANA WATER SAMUDRAM PALU
+ DO U KNOW RUKMAMMAPET KOHINOOR WAS FOUND THERE FIR...
+ PALAMOOR MAHABOOBNAGAR HISTORY
+ TELANGANA DANCING SCULPTURE from WARANGAL
+ KOTTAM AS VILLAGE UNITS BY SATAVAHANAS
+ ROMANS VISITED NAGARJUNA KONDA
+ HALA GATHA SAPTASADI A CMPILATION OF STORIES
+ FIRST TO ISSUE COINS FROM KOTILINGALA MINT
+ SPREAD FROM KOTILINGALA,AND KARIMNAGAR,ADILABAD RE...
+ TELANGANA RULERS BETWEEN KRISHNA & GODAVARI
+ SATAVAHANAS IKSVAKU LINKS WITH EUROPE
+ SATAVAHANAS FIRST TELANGANA RULERS
+ TELANGANA SATAVAHANA FOUNDED AT KOTILINGALA
+ TELANGANA RULERS STARTED SHALIVAHANA SAKA
+ TELANGANA KINGS CAPTURED PATALIPUTRA OF MAURYAS
+ NAGARJUNASAGAR DAM PLANNED IN 1903 BY NIZAM
+ TELANGANA SATAVAHANA QUEENS GOLD EAR RINGS
+ Archaeological evidence SHOW CAPITAL IN KARIMNAGAR...
+ TELANGANA SATAVAHANA RULERS
+ Sri RAMA in Badrachalam
+ TELANGANA DURING MAHABARATA PERIOD

HOW NIZAM GAVE BELLARY RAYALASEEMA TO ENGLISH

the Nizam was compelled to disassociate himself from Hyder Ali. In A.D.1800 yet another treaty was signed by the Nizam with the British altering the earlier treaties to increase the strength of the English army in Hyderabad. In lieu of the cost of maintenance of the force, the Nizam had to cede to the company an area comprising the districts of Rayalaseema and Bellary (now in Karnataka). With this the Nizam lost not only the territory but also reputation and power.

NIZAM CAPITAL FROM AURANGABAD TO HYDERABAD in1763

Hostilities recommenced in India between the French and the English in AD.1758 on the outbreak of Seven Years War in Europe in A.D.1756. As a result, the French lost their power in India and consequently it also lost influence at Hyderabad. In A.D.1762 Nizam Ali Khan dislodged Salabat Jung and proclaimed himself as Nizam.

Hyderabad came into focus again when Nizam Ali Khan (Nizam II) in A.D.1763 shifted the capital of the Deccan from Aurangabad to Hyderabad. Such a move helped rapid economic growth and expansion of the city, resulting in its importance and prosperity.

MINING SECTOR,MUSHAM

The growth of GSDP in certain districts of Telangana is driven more by the mining sector and not by the interventions of the Government as claimed by the vested interests in the
Andhra region, who are now pushing the idea of continuance of United Andhra Pradesh.

Table 4.3: GROSS DISTRICT DOMESTIC PRODUCT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FROM MINING AND

QUARRYING AT CURRENT PRICES (% Contribution
District 1999 2007 2000-1- 2-3- 2004 District 1999-Average -07 -08
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06

1 Srikakulam 1.35 1.13 1.25 1.56 1.75 1.70 1.35 0.84 1.48 1.38
2 Vizianagaram 0.65 0.70 0.52 0.48 0.63 0.64 0.76 0.57 0.58 0.61
3 Visakhapatnam 2.26 1.90 0.97 1.08 1.32 1.08 0.82 0.50 1.21 1.24
4 East Godavari 10.81 11.22 10.49 13.38 11.48 11.00 9.96 6.53 5.04 9.99
5 West Godavari 0.79 0.58 0.88 1.47 0.72 0.15 0.19 0.46 0.87 0.68
6 Krishna 2.37 2.65 1.54 1.37 1.37 1.05 1.12 0.91 3.83 1.80
7 Guntur 3.15 2.76 2.76 2.83 1.99 1.66 1.56 1.21 0.91 2.09
8 Prakasam 1.97 2.62 2.99 3.87 5.11 5.77 6.22 6.12 6.80 4.61
9 Nellore 0.18 0.23 0.82 0.56 0.18 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.72 0.34
Andhra 23.53 23.79 22.22 26.61 24.55 23.21 22.10 17.26 21.45 22.75

10 Chittoor 1.47 1.11 1.38 1.43 1.28 0.40 0.36 1.01 1.48 1.10
28.0
11 Kadapa 1.16 1.73 1.86 1.68 1.95 2.04 2.50 33.6
1
1 8.28
12 Ananthapur 0.48 0.49 0.69 0.85 1.66 1.89 3.76 2.98 2.13 1.66
13 Kurnool 3.20 3.14 4.54 3.49 3.56 3.86 8.14 3.43 4.10 4.16
Rayalaseema 6.32 6.48 8.47 7.44 8.44 8.20 14.77 41.02 35.72 15.21
14 Mahaboob
nagar 0.03 0.13 0.12 0.03 0.71 2.40 5.82 1.59 1.98 1.42
15 Ranga Reddy 0.72 1.61 2.24 2.31 2.38 2.32 2.56 2.51 2.74 2.15
16 Hyderabad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
17 Medak 0.60 1.24 0.43 0.58 0.62 0.49 0.52 0.66 0.89 0.67
18 Nizamabad 0.02 0.03 0.34 0.52 0.72 0.63 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.56
19 Adilabad 13.83 14.73 14.21 11.46 13.07 9.58 7.99 6.18 6.75 10.87
20 Karimnagar 28.48 24.89 25.00 24.58 23.46 26.02 21.39 14.64 13.50 22.44
21 Warangal 1.49 2.10 1.99 2.06 2.26 3.90 3.67 2.20 3.41 2.56
22 Khammam 23.88 23.58 23.51 22.68 21.99 21.22 18.47 11.56 11.14 19.78
23 Nalgonda 1.10 1.44 1.47 1.74 1.79 2.04 1.84 1.43 1.47 1.59

Telangana 70.15 69.74 69.31 65.95 67.01 68.59 63.13 41.72 42.83 62.05
Andhra Pradesh 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Source: Government of Andhra Pradesh Directorate
Source: Government of Andhra Pradesh Directorate of Economics and Statistics “District Domestic
Product of Andhra Pradesh 1999-200 to 2007-08

The contribution of the Telangana region to the total GSDP generated in the State from the mining and quarrying sector is more than 62 per cent. The benefit of mining and mining income has mostly gone to the other regions of the State and the local people


SORRY CHART IN MESS INFO IS IMPORTANT OK HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND SOME PROBLEM IN BROWSER/BLOGGER

GSDP from agriculture sector

Growth of GSDP from agriculture sector is much more stable in Andhra region as
compared with the Telangana region as may be observed from the fluctuations in the
annual growth rates of agricultural GSDP. A dip in agricultural growth in a year on account
of drought or pest attacks or for any other reason results in a higher growth in the
following year because of the base effect. This may pull up the overall growth of the
GSDP. For instance, agricultural GSDP was estimated to have grown by as much as
62.13 per cent in 2005-06 in the Telangana region from a negative growth of 18.95 in
2004-05. If the abnormal year of 2005-06 is left out, then the average growth of
GSDP in Telangana region will be the lowest in the period 1999-2000 to 2007-08.
Agriculture sector contributes over 25 per cent of the GSDP in the Telangana
region.

The above analysis clearly demonstrates that the GSDP growth in the Telangana
region is not higher than that in the remaining two regions. Because of
predominance of rainfed agriculture in the Telangana region and dependence on
wells, growth of agriculture in the region is highly fluctuating. The incidence of
farmer suicides is much higher in the region.

TELANGANA DEVELOPMENT - myth dist wide data

TELANGANA DEVELOPMENT -
MORE A MYTH THAN A REALITY
Introduction
District-wise growth rates of State Gross Domestic Product (GSDP) are often used
selectively to wrongly come to the conclusion that Telangana region has been experiencing
higher growth rates in relation to the other two regions in the State because of the efforts
made by the State Government to develop the region. Nothing can be farther from the truth
than this conclusion drawn from the trends in the growth of GSDP. We present below the
trends in the growth of GSDP by districts from 1994-95 to 2007-08 (Table 4.1).
Table 4.1: Growth of State Gross Domestic by Districts in Andhra Pradesh At 193-94 Prices
( In Percent per Annum)
District/Region 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 05 06 (R)
08 (P) Average
1. Srikakulam 13.56 1.96 2.22 11.48 9.64 0.70 13.93 9.24 7.84
2. Vizianagaram 3.76 9.88 -0.91 11.00 16.48 1.54 12.87 6.26 7.61
3. Visakhapatnam 18.09 4.53 14.88 13.74 12.99 1.49 10.38 6.83 10.37
4.East Godavari 1.65 6.51 4.67 10.96 6.12 1.91 11.09 6.53 6.18
5. West Godavari 3.80 -1.27 7.59 13.84 8.98 -3.52 8.73 13.01 6.40
6. Krishna 2.96 5.99 5.68 -2.78 13.73 14.51 9.72 8.90 7.34
7. Guntur 6.77 7.74 -8.63 12.14 6.99 7.67 7.92 7.88 6.06
8. Prakasam 15.67 0.83 -1.64 9.97 26.02 5.23 12.69 6.23 9.37
9. Nallore 5.16 7.88 5.96 -1.43 13.14 3.20 13.04 8.07 6.88
Andhra 7.32 4.82 4.02 8.77 11.66 3.92 10.59 8.09 7.40
10. Chittor 15.34 7.33 -2.83 9.40 10.31 -2.24 8.92 11.30 7.19
11. Kadapa 10.98 -6.96 2.43 10.08 11.62 0.71 67.82 19.52 14.52
12. Ananthapur 37.41 -11.86 0.03 6.19 29.50 -8.88 4.64 30.91 10.99
13. Kurnool 13.85 6.77 -1.26 8.91 3.63 23.93 -0.91 18.42 9.17
Rayalaseema 19.72 -1.17 -0.74 8.56 13.82 2.36 15.79 19.79 9.77
14. Mahabubnagar 15.26 7.79 4.21 4.38 5.61 32.23 1.93 15.45 10.86
15.Ranga Reddy 1.47 9.25 6.40 7.89 6.76 26.30 15.95 6.53 10.07
16. Hyderabad 6.35 7.97 9.38 7.58 3.09 17.58 13.31 10.51 9.47
17. Medak -8.08 5.56 -1.06 16.71 2.78 8.58 11.61 12.24 6.04
18. Nizamabad 13.02 -0.67 1.57 -0.20 3.75 22.64 8.64 11.49 7.53
19. Adilabad 8.07 12.47 -2.62 16.65 -5.00 19.27 11.36 10.01 8.78
20. Karimnagar 0.28 1.67 2.40 12.68 -6.71 32.65 8.51 6.31 7.22
21. Warangal 17.66 -0.76 -3.86 16.67 -2.03 18.93 6.45 11.59 8.08
22.Khammamm 6.15 7.77 2.89 11.15 4.51 9.26 8.43 8.96 7.39
23. Nalgonda 5.65 2.90 -2.65 9.82 11.25 20.07 7.87 14.23 8.64
Telangana 5.11 5.66 2.63 10.24 2.53 20.42 10.21 10.27 8.38
Andhra Pradesh 8.16 4.22 2.73 9.35 8.15 10.24 11.16 10.75 8.09
Source: Government of Andhra Pradesh Directorate of Economics and Statistics “District Domestic
Product of Andhra Pradesh 1999-200 to 2007-08
sorry chart not uploading want to share info see and assimilate the facts

G O 610 good bad ugly

Government Order 610

There have been major violations of the Presidential Order in all the Telangana Zones,
more particularly in Zones V and VI. The Telangana Employees unions have been
submitting representation pointing out the violations. Following these representations, the
State Government issued the Order No. 610 on December 30 1985 addressing some of
the serious violations of the Presidential Order. This is the umpteenth time that the
safeguards given to Telangana were violated with impunity. This Order of the Government
is proof enough of the Government’s admissions of the violations. The Go provides for the
repatriation of all employees allotted to Zones V and VI in violation of the zonalisation of
local cadres under the Six-Point Formula and rectification of other violations.

Violation of Government Order 610

What else can be expected by the employees of Telangana, except the violation of
the GO 610 which itself was intended to rectify the previous violations. Is there any
remedy for the employees? As things have unfolded, the GO was never
implemented. What can be expected except one more assurance which was never
intended to be implemented? How long will the people of Telangana be neglected
with abandon. Is the Government not accountable to its pronounced assurances?
The Government of Andhra Pradesh appointed a One Man Commission (Girglani) on
June 25 2001 to receive representations regarding the injustice done in the
implementation of the GO. 610 and to suggest follow up action for the rectification of
defects, anomalies and irregularities. Despite the Commission’s recommendations, there
has been no action. Why should Government bury the GO all these years. There is no
remedy short of separate statehood.

A House Committee of the State Legislature examined the issue of violation of GO. 610
and submitted its interim Report on March 17, 2003. The Committee unanimously
recommended immediate repatriation of the non-locals appointed to the posts earmarked
for the locals. The Committee further recommended that the directions given by the
Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal should be implemented in letter and spirit
forthwith by the Government and that a combined seniority list should be prepared for the
employees keeping aside those to be repatriated to their respective Zones. Despite
assurances, GO. 610 is yet to be implemented in all its aspects.


We have presented a factual account of the situation in Telangana since the
formation of the State of Andhra Pradesh in 1956. It is a story of assurances which
were never meant to be fulfilled. The assurances started with the Gentlemen’s
Agreement and its violation followed by Eight Point Formula, Five-Point Formula,
Presidential Order, Six-Point Formula and GO. 610. Each of these assurances was
given following the violation of the earlier assurance. Violation after violation of the
successive assurances has left the people of Telangana with no option but to seek
a separate statehood for the region.

No assurance will work in a Government dominated by Andhra political leadership
and administration too dominated by them.

G O 610 good bad ugly

Government Order 610

There have been major violations of the Presidential Order in all the Telangana Zones,
more particularly in Zones V and VI. The Telangana Employees unions have been
submitting representation pointing out the violations. Following these representations, the
State Government issued the Order No. 610 on December 30 1985 addressing some of
the serious violations of the Presidential Order. This is the umpteenth time that the
safeguards given to Telangana were violated with impunity. This Order of the Government
is proof enough of the Government’s admissions of the violations. The Go provides for the
repatriation of all employees allotted to Zones V and VI in violation of the zonalisation of
local cadres under the Six-Point Formula and rectification of other violations.

Violation of Government Order 610

What else can be expected by the employees of Telangana, except the violation of
the GO 610 which itself was intended to rectify the previous violations. Is there any
remedy for the employees? As things have unfolded, the GO was never
implemented. What can be expected except one more assurance which was never
intended to be implemented? How long will the people of Telangana be neglected
with abandon. Is the Government not accountable to its pronounced assurances?
The Government of Andhra Pradesh appointed a One Man Commission (Girglani) on
June 25 2001 to receive representations regarding the injustice done in the
implementation of the GO. 610 and to suggest follow up action for the rectification of
defects, anomalies and irregularities. Despite the Commission’s recommendations, there
has been no action. Why should Government bury the GO all these years. There is no
remedy short of separate statehood.

A House Committee of the State Legislature examined the issue of violation of GO. 610
and submitted its interim Report on March 17, 2003. The Committee unanimously
recommended immediate repatriation of the non-locals appointed to the posts earmarked
for the locals. The Committee further recommended that the directions given by the
Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal should be implemented in letter and spirit
forthwith by the Government and that a combined seniority list should be prepared for the
employees keeping aside those to be repatriated to their respective Zones. Despite
assurances, GO. 610 is yet to be implemented in all its aspects.


We have presented a factual account of the situation in Telangana since the
formation of the State of Andhra Pradesh in 1956. It is a story of assurances which
were never meant to be fulfilled. The assurances started with the Gentlemen’s
Agreement and its violation followed by Eight Point Formula, Five-Point Formula,
Presidential Order, Six-Point Formula and GO. 610. Each of these assurances was
given following the violation of the earlier assurance. Violation after violation of the
successive assurances has left the people of Telangana with no option but to seek
a separate statehood for the region.

No assurance will work in a Government dominated by Andhra political leadership
and administration too dominated by them.

Telangana was part of the princely state of Hyderabad

Telangana was part of the princely state of Hyderabad, which
consisted of Telugu, Marathi and Kannada speaking regions. At the time of independence,
Hyderabad State continued to retain its separate identity. Following the intervention of the
Union Government which was popularly termed as the ‘Police Action,’ Hyderabad State
was merged with the Indian Union on September 17, 1948. From 1948, Hyderabad State
remained under the administration of the Union Government till general elections were
held in 1952. During this period, a number of people from United Madras State and other
States were brought in to run the administration. The officials brought in from outside the
State had no empathy for the people of the State and they behaved more like rulers than
civil servants meant for serving the people. The integration of the State with the Indian
Union did not make any difference to the people of the State and they continued to be
treated with disdain and apathy. The people who came to the State from United Madras
cornered all the important jobs much to the consternation of the people of the State. The
Administrator of the Union Government being outside the State made the matters worse.
The feelings of local people were so intense about being alienated and being denied of
their rights that a ‘Non-Mulki Movement’ started in 1952 against the continuance and
domination of people from outside the State. More important, this gave birth to the fears
and apprehensions in the minds of the local people about what could happen to them if
they were to merge with the neighbouring State of Andhra. This movement lasted over a
month and students from all the regions of the Hyderabad state spontaneously
participated in this popular movement seeking employment of people from within the State
in government jobs. Four people laid down their lives when the government attempted to
suppress the movement with force. The purpose of recalling this episode is to bring home
the point the damage that can be inflicted by an indifferent administration with no
accountability and a government that does not represent the will of the people. In a way,
the demand for a separate statehood for Telangana had its roots in the mulki agitation

Met Shri Krishna Committee,SEE @,FAX,Phone no,

Email vkduggal.ccsap@mha.gov.in,
FAX 011-23022444
PHONE no 011-23022300

TCMG meets Jaipal Reddy

RAHUL GANDHI WHO BEARS THE BURDEN OF NEEDY

WE ALL LOVE HIM FOR HIS SIMPLICITY AND HELPFULL NATURE TO ALL THE NEEDY PEOPLE IN INDIA

VISITED RAJGHAT,saw gandhi words on DICENTRALIZATION.

OUR ENTHUSIASM SOURED AFTER SEEING BAPU WORDS ON DECENTRALIZATION

TCMG Gave Rahul Gandhi Satavahana coin,

Satavahana rulers conquered Naga rulers and Gopa ones such as Somagopa etc who reigned around 300BC


Have a look at Satavahana Queen EAR RINGS,OU,Ashwaghosa who toured extensively and established Telangana colonies all over East Asia.


IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN HISTORY MAIL ME OK


TCMG HAS GIVEN BROCHURE WITH THIS COIN TO RAHUL GANDHI,WHICH HE RECEIVED WITH APPRECIATION,

WE ALL IN THE GROUP THANK SHRI RAHUL GANDHI FOR HIS KIND GESTURE.

Telanagana TCMG stay in Delhi at Historic Western Court,

WHERE MANY INDIAN LEADERS STAYED FOR WELL BEING OF INDIAN PEOPLE.

OUR MORNING JOG ON GRASS OF THIS PLACE MADE US REMEMBER AND MADE US HAPPY,FELT HONOURED THAT WE ARE WALKING ON THE SAME PLACE AND GRASS WHICH WAS PROUD TO HAVE WITNESSED AND BORE THE BURDEN OF THE FOOTPRINTS OUR OUR GREAT LEADERS WHO BROUGHT US INDEPENDENCE TO OUR MOTHERLAND INDIA FROM BRITISH.


OUR MORNING WALK EVERYDAY WAS A LESSON FROM THE PAGES OF INDIAN HISTORY.

We want Telangana THE PEOPLE CHOICE