WHO IS ASAFJAHI First king Mir Kamaruddin

Asaf Jahis

The founder of this dynasty was one Mir Kamaruddin, a noble and a courtier of the Mughal Muhammad Shah, who negotiated for a peace treaty with Nadirshah, the Iranian invader; got disgusted with the intrigues that prevailed in Delhi. He was on his way back to the Deccan, where, earlier he was a Subedar. But he had to confront Mubariz Khan, as a result of a plot by the Mughal emperor to kill the former. Mubariz Khan failed in his attempt and he was himself slain. This took place in A.D.1724, and henceforth Mir Kamaruddin, who assumed the title of Nizam-ul-Mulk, conducted himself as an independent prince. Earlier, while he was one of the Ministers of the Mughal emperor Muhammad Shah, the latter conferred on him the title of Asaf Jah. Thus begins the Asaf Jahi rule over Golconda with the capital at Aurangabad. It was only during Nizam II rule that the capital of the Deccan Subha was shifted to Hyderabad reviving its importance.

The Asafjahi Nizams are generally counted as seven, though they were ten. Nasir Jung and Muzaffar Jung, son and grandson of the Nizam I who were killed by the Kurnool and Cuddapah Nawabs and Salabatjung who also ruled for a decade, were not counted by the historians though the Mughal emperors at Delhi recognised them as Subedars of the Deccan.

The Nizams of Asafjahi dynasty who ruled the Deccan are the following:

(1) Mir Kamaruddin (Nizam-ul-Mulk - Asaf Jah I) (A.D.1724--1748), (2) Nasir Jung (A.D. 1748--1751), (3) Muzaffar Jung (A.D.1750--1751), (4) Salabat Jung (AD.1751--1761), (5) Nizam Ali Khan - Asaf Jah II (A.D.1762--1803), (6) Nizam III Sikandar Jah (A.D.1803--1829), (7) Nizam IV -- Nasir-ud-Daula (A.D.1829--1857), (8) Nizam V -- Afzal-ud-Daula (A.D.1857--1869), (9) Nizam VI -- Mir Mahaboob Ali Khan (A.D.1869--1911), and (10) Nizam VII -- Mir Osman Ali Khan (AD.1911--1948 September).

IRRIGATION FACTS

1953 Andhra Pradesh the area irrigated under Tanks in the Telangana 11 lakh acres. Now it is hardly 6.5 lakh acres. • Education in crores Andhra 1308.56, Rayalaseema 382.87, Telangana 163.39 • Schools - Andhra 26800, Rayalaseema 13000, Telangana 17954 • Hospitals - Andhra (9 dist) 666, Rayalaseema (4 dist) 303, Telangana (10 dist) 270

•

• Total Govt employees- Seemandhra 9 lakhs, Telangana (10 dist) 3 lakhs • Industries Andhra 6100, Rayalaseema 773, Telangana 1250 • Power Utilization Andhra 54%, Rayalaseema 23%, Telangana 23% Nagarjuna Sagar project Submerged land Cultivation land 0% 20 lakh acres Andhra 100% 4.5 lakh acres Telangana • Polavaram project is submerging 250 small villages in Telangana, displacing 5 lakh tribals is going to provide lakhs of acres cultivation land to Andhra.

WATER SHARE subject from an Friend

AP got nearly 40 major projects in which 37 went to Seemandhra region Telangana side Seemandhra side
SLBC (30 TMC) not taken up, SLBC beyond Musi (20 TMC) not taken up, RDS extension (10 TMC) not taken up, LIS to high level areas in Mahabubnagar not taken up, Bheema LIS 20 TMC under construction for many years Telugu Ganga project (29 TMC) completed, SRBC (19 TMC) completed, KC canal extension completed (10 TMC), Upland areas Brahmamgari matham reservoir (10 TMC) completed, SRBC beyond Gorakallu (20TMC) under construction, Puchintala evaporation losses (5 TMC) under construction, Veligonda not recommended project (40 TMC) almost completed, Handrineeva sujala sarvanthi not recommended (38 TMC) almost completed, Galerunagari sujala sravanthi not recommended (38 TMC) is under construction

Pothireddypadu regulator was originally created for drinking water to Chennai with 5 TMC. Gradually 5 projects were ‘piggy backed’ & augmented to canal. In the name of Chennai drinking water, Seemandhra wanted to take entire Srisailam water • Veligonda project is being constructed on war footing basis. This will drain 60 TMC of water from Srisailam. This project is not allotted (water share by tribunal) and do not have clearance till now. • Handrineeva Sujala Sravanthi, not allotted not cleared project is going on war footing • SLBC despite of all recommendations, clearances and permissions never started. • Manuguru thermal power station proposed to be in Telangana was lobbied to be shifted to Vijayawada, transporting coal from singareni. • Dummugudem Hydal power station remained a promise on paper. • Icchampalli power (975 MW) project never started. • If Mumbai is not a free-zone, Delhi is not a freezone, Kolkatta is not a freezone, Chennai is not a freezone, Pune is not a freezone … why should Hyderabad be a freezone? Andhras were even demanding entire Telangana should be freezone.

WATER and Harrasment

Catchment area of Krishna river in AP Catchment area Allocation of Water
Andhra Rayalaseema Telangana 13% 18% 69% 49% 16% 35%

Actual Utilization
87% 13% Less than 1%

Catchment area of Godavari river in AP Catchment area
Andhra Telangana

Utilization Water

21%(310 TMC) 23%(320 TMC) 79%(1170 TMC) 9.6% (143 TMC) 405 TMC is being diverted to Andhra via Polavaram project

• Total loss of water share of Telangana merging with Andhra is 1125 TMC. 1 TMC serves 10000 acres, i.e. total cultivation land Telangana lost is 11, 25,000 acres. • 7 Telangana, 3 Andhra, 1 Rayalaseema are declared backward districts. • 65% of Industries in Telangana are owned by Andhra. One Telangana persons are harrased to build industry They were tormented so much that they gave it up.

satavahanas first telangana bhuddist rulers from karimnagar region

satavahanas first telangana bhuddist rulers from karimnagar region
Published On : March 14th, 2009 Updated at : March 14th, 2009
Tags :
• Telangana-Politics
• Karimnagar
• Arts
• Other
The Satavahanas ruled a large and powerful empire that withstood the onslaughts from Central Asia. Aside from their military power, their commercialism and naval activity is evidenced by establishment of Indian colonies in southeast Asia for the first time in history

There are divergent views regarding the starting period of the Satavahana chronology and the total duration of the dynasty. According to D. R. Bhandarkar the Satavahana rule commenced in the 6 th or 5 th century B.C. But other scholars did not accept this view. Dr. M. Rama Rao held the view that the Satavahanas flourished between 221A.D

THE MULKI RULES 1949

ANNEXURE-2.1
THE MULKI RULES 1949

Government of Hyderabad
(Extracts from Hyderabad Civil Service Regulations VII Edition 1950)
Preface

These Regulations promulgated in obedience to His Exalted Highness, the Nizam’s Firman dated 25th
Ramzan 1337 H (corresponding to 18th Amardad 1328 Fasli ) were for the first time published in
1328 Fasli.
These are now printed and published for the seventh time including corrections and
additions upto the end of Azur 1359 Fasli( October 1949).

ZAHEERUDDIN AHMED
Dated 1st November 1949 Controller-General
Accounts & Audit.

Danger behind the mulki rule

Following the ‘Non-Mulki’ agitation, the Government of Hyderabad notified Mulki Rules on
November 1, 1949. These rules provided safeguards to the people of erstwhile Hyderabad
State in government jobs. In terms of the provisions of these rules, no person was to be
appointed to any superior or inferior service if he was not a mulki and any person who was
a non-mulki was deemed to have been dismissed. A person was considered mulki, if he
was a subject of Hyderabad State or by residence in Hyderabad State was entitled to be a mulki. A person was also considered a mulki, if his father had completed 15 years of
service at the time of his birth or the wife of the person was a mulki. A person was
deemed to be a mulki if he was a permanent resident of Hyderabad State for at least 15
years and has abandoned the idea of returning to the place of his previous residence and
has obtained an affidavit to this effect attested by a Magistrate. The Mulki Rules 1949 are
reproduced in Annexure 2.1.
“In regard to appointments and employment in Telangana region, they seem to be having
some fears that educationally more advanced people from Andhra region might usurp all
avenues of employment depriving Telangana people of their due share. I want to make it
clear that we do not want anything in your share of employment at all. We are assuring
you that we would not touch your 1/3 share in employment. Such an assurance is made
not only on my personal behalf but also on behalf of this Assembly and the Government.”

FAZAL ALI TELANGANA SHOULD BE SEPERATE

State Reorganisation Commission (SRC,1955) headed by Justice Fazal Ali has recommended that Telangana area shall continue as a separate state.

ANDHRA STATE IN 1956

In Andhra State:

1.Deficit Budget. Difficulty to pay even salaries of Government employees.

2.Kurnool was the capital city. No top ranking city in the country. No proper transport facilities. No proper amenities. No big buildings. Governement offices were functioning under tents.


3.Well ahead in Education. No vacancies in jobs.

4.30.65 Lakh acres irrigated land, mostly under canals.

TELANGANA IN 1956

In Hyderabad State:
1.Surplus Budget

2.Hyderabad was the capital city. It was 4th largest city in the country. Well established Transport facitlities(Airport, Railway Stations, Roads) many Big buildings (for Offices, Osmania Hospital, Osmania University, City College, Nizam College etc.) established Drinking water and Drainage facilities etc.
3.Backward in Education. Many vacancies in jobs.
4.18.2 Lakh acres irrigated land, mostly under Minor irrigation i.e., tanks(cheruvulu).

TELANGANA FOREVER

WE WANT TELANGANA

spirit of telangana,Telanagana UTSAV